Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Larger Waist associated with Greater Risk of
Death
August,
2010--Individuals with a large waist
circumference appear to have a greater risk
of dying from any cause over a nine-year
period, according to a report in the August
9/23 issue of Archives
of Internal Medicine, one of the JAMA/Archives
journals.
Having a large waist circumference has
previously been associated with
inflammation, insulin resistance, type 2
diabetes, abnormal cholesterol levels and
heart disease, according to background
information in the article.
This may be because waist circumference is
strongly correlated with fat tissue in the
viscera—surrounding the organs in the
abdomen—which is thought to be more
dangerous than fat tissue under the skin.
Eric J. Jacobs, Ph.D., and colleagues at the
American Cancer Society, Atlanta, examined
the association between waist circumference
and risk of death among 48,500 men and
56,343 women age 50 and older (median or
midpoint age, 69 years in men and 67 years
in women).
All had participated in the Cancer
Prevention Study II Nutrition Cohort, for
which they completed a mailed questionnaire
about demographic, medical and behavioral
factors in 1992 or 1993 and provided
information about weight and waist
circumference in 1997.
Deaths and their causes were tracked through
the National Death Index until Dec. 31,
2006; a total of 9,315 men and 5,332 women
died during this timeframe.
After adjusting for body mass index (BMI)
and other risk factors, very large waists
(120 centimeters or 47 inches or larger in
men, and 110 centimeters or 42 inches or
larger in women) were associated with
approximately twice the risk of death during
the study period.
A larger waist was associated with higher
risk of death across all categories of BMI,
including normal weight, overweight and
obese; however, among women, the association
was strongest for those at a normal weight.
“The reason for the stronger association
between waist circumference and mortality
among women with low BMI in our study is
unclear,” the authors write.
“Future detailed analyses of the
relationship between waist circumference and
visceral adipose tissue or measures of
insulin resistance within categories of BMI
could identify biological reasons for
potential differences in the strength of the
association between waist circumference and
mortality.”
The results may affect the development of
future guidelines for obesity, the authors
suggest. “Currently available clinical
guidelines from the National Institutes of
Health are based on evidence from the
1990s,” they write.
“These guidelines recommend that waist
circumference be used to identify increased
disease risk only among individuals in the
overweight and obese categories of BMI. In
addition, the NIH guidelines recommend
weight loss goals for all patients in the
obese category of BMI (30 or greater), but
they do not specifically recommend weight
loss goals for abdominally obese patients
(waist circumference of 88 centimeters or
larger in women or 102 centimeters or larger
in men) who are in the normal or overweight
BMI category unless they also have two or
more cardiovascular risk factors or a desire
to lose weight.”