counter customizable free hit
Overpayments to Medicare Private Health Plans fail to ensure better benefits in poor and minority communities, consumer group reports
America's Seniors at www.TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
AddThis Feed ButtonNow, keep up to date with daily feeds of newly posted stories about America's Seniors...click on the box to the left
Election 2008...New! MSNBC Dashboard with continuous updates...information...stats...click here
 



 



728x90





 

 

Read our Blog, RxforAmericanHealth...Newest post... Pharma, allies disingenuous, practicing misdirection on real purposes of proposed legislation on sale of controlled substances over the Internet
 




Home
AARP Push 2007
AARP Support
Advantage Disenrollment
Alarm Over Cuts
AMA Says Block Cuts
Avoid Expensive Plans
Bi-Partisan Support
Bush Cuts Opposed
Change Advantage Marketing
Change in Part D Payments
Costly Advantage Plans
Doughnut Hole Grows
GOP Opposes Negotiation
Handbook Misleads
Hospital Compare
Information  Gaps
Cancer Drs. Revolt
Cuts Averted
Donut Hole Grows
Drs. Seek Action
E-Prescribing Push
E-Prescribing Support
Equipment Fraud Target
Humana Greed
Jerry Seeks Delay
Locking In Plans
Low-Income Concerns
Low-Income Enrollment
Means Test Proposed
Medicare Advantage Fraud
Medicare Advantage Abuses
Medicare Advantage Hearing
Medicare Low Grades
Medicare Q&A
Medicare Advantage Waste
medicine_info.htm
McClellan to Resign
Medicare Helps Clients
Medicare is Answer
Meds Management
Minnesota Meeting
More Part D Increases?
Negotiations Favored
Negotiations Suppport
Negotiation Support
New CMS Cuts
Off-Label Drugs
Off-Label Law Suit
Ohio Cuts Rapped
One Vote Short
Oregon Seniors Hurt
Part D, Alternatives
Other Medicare News
Part D Change Urged
Part D Impact Study
Part D More Costly
Part B Increase
Part D Comparison Tool
Part D Enrollments
Part D Premiums Up
Plans Fail
Older Patients Pay More
Payments to Dead Doctors
Protection Lacking
MD Pay Reduction
Part B Increase
Part D Roller Coaster
Plan Advice Available
Premium Cut Possible
Premiums Near $100
Price Negotiation Support
Profits Soar
Reimbusement Suit
Removing Mobility
Repayment Concerns
Repayment Halted
Residents, Part D
Restore Cuts Urged
Satisfaction Survey
Solvency Issue Ignored
SS Payments at Risk
Sustainable Growth
Too Complicated
Unequal Payments
Uninsured Costs
Vets Like Program
Waiver Sought
$155B Pharma Lobbying
Bush Cut Impact Spreads
Stopping Overpayments
$5 Billion Caregiving Cut
Medicare Bill Passed
Part D Payments Costly
Stopping Bush Cuts

 

 

Google
 

 

Web TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
 

New Service for TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com readers...roll mouse over, click on highlighted links in stories to review items from Amazon

Overpayments to Medicare Private Health Plans fail to ensure better benefits in poor and minority communities, consumer group reports... Expanding access to Medicare Savings Programs is a more effective way to lower health care costs for low-income people with Medicare

New York, NY -- Low-income people with Medicare enrolled in Medicare private fee-for-service plans pay more for their health care in some counties than people enrolled in the same plans in neighboring, more affluent counties, according to a new Medicare Rights Center report.    

“Certain members of Congress and the insurance industry lobby have been working overtime to sell the argument that overpaying insurers is in the best interest of poor and minority Americans.  But it is a misleading, untruthful strategy to keep the overpayments to Medicare private health plans flowing,” said Robert M. Hayes, president of the Medicare Rights Center, a national consumer service organization. 

 

“Our county-to-county analysis found that there is no correlation between excessive federal subsidies and lower health care costs or richer benefits in minority and low-income communities,” said Mr. Hayes.

In Medicare Private Health Plans vs. Medicare Savings Programs, the Medicare Rights Center cites examples where Medicare private fee-for-service plans in affluent counties receive greater federal subsidies per enrollee than those in nearby poorer counties where more minorities reside. 

 

The consumer group also found that the out-of-pocket costs are greater for people enrolled in plans in the poorer communities, belying assertions by the Administration that excess payments to private insurers are the best route to improve health coverage for poor people with Medicare.   

The Medicare Rights Center report compares Medicare private fee-for-service plan premiums and benefit packages for eight counties in four states with income, race and ethnicity data from the U.S. Census Bureau.  The report indicates how much the federal subsidies to private health plans in each of these counties exceed health care costs under Original Medicare.  

In Clermont County, a relatively affluent county in Ohio, there is no monthly premium for one private health plan yet the monthly premium is $69 for the same plan in a neighboring county with almost double the proportion of families living in poverty and a high percentage of African American residents.  An analysis of health plans in Utah found that one plan charges no monthly premium in a relatively affluent county, but in a poorer county, the plan members pay 27 percent more for an average six-day hospital stay than plan members in the affluent county.   

“The best way for Congress to lower health costs for low-income Americans with Medicare is to improve access to the federal and state programs, the Medicare Savings Programs, that directly lower consumer costs,” said Mr. Hayes.  “By aligning the income and asset criteria for these programs with that of the Medicare drug benefit subsidy, more people in more places would get the help that these programs were intended to provide to the poor.”

The Medicare Savings Programs, targeted to low-income people with Medicare, help pay the Medicare monthly Part B premium, deductibles and coinsurance.  Currently, the income criterion for enrollment in Medicare Savings Programs is 135 percent of the federal poverty level but it is 150 percent of the federal poverty level for “Extra Help,” the federal subsidy for the Medicare drug benefit available through private plans. 

Asset limits are $4,000 for individuals and $6,000 for couples for Medicare Savings Programs but more generous for Extra Help at $11,207 for individuals and $23,410 for couples.  The Medicare Savings Program known as the Qualified Medicare Beneficiary Program (QMB) covers all cost sharing for medical services but there is no private health plan that covers all costs.  

As Congress debates whether to cut overpayments to Medicare private health plans, the insurance industry lobby and some members of Congress justify them by claiming overpayments help lower the out-of-pocket costs for minorities and low-income people with Medicare.  The federal government pays insurance companies an average of 12 percent more for each insured member -- 19 percent more for people in private-fee-for service plans -- than what it would cost Original Medicare to cover these same individuals.   

The Medicare Rights Center’s report Medicare Private Health Plans vs. Medicare Savings Programs is available at http://www.medicarerights.org/MA_vs_MSP.pdf

 

 

 

...
...
...

 

 

 



 

 

Home
Up
About Us
America's Seniors WebMall
Aging News
California Report
Caregiving
Community/Workplace
Fitness,Health
Election 2008
Grandparents
Health Care Policy
Hispanic Seniors
Contents/Sitemap
Prescription Drugs
Pharma Suits
Restaurant Reviews
Rural Seniors
Safety & Security
Growing New Parts
Seniors Commentary
Seniors' Entertainment
Seniors Headlines
Seniors Finances
Seniors' Issues
Seniors Relationships
Seniors Rights
Social Security News
The Virtual Family
Travel News
TSN Radio on Web
Veterans' Tribute
White House Cards
Privacy Policy
Sitemap Contents
Consumer Alert

 

 

 

 

Copyright 1999-2008 TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
To Contact Us, Click Here