
New Service for
TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com readers...roll mouse over, click on
highlighted links in stories to review items from Amazon
States help seniors age at home
By Christine Vestal, Stateline.org Staff
Writer
Nearly all states have worked to make sure
low-income Medicaid recipients have the
option of receiving long-term care in their
homes, rather than entering confining and
costly nursing homes.
But states are now recognizing that seniors
and the disabled of all income levels need
help navigating the complex array of local
care providers, and are setting up one-stop
counseling centers for anyone wanting advice
on services and how to pay for them.
“Most people want to remain at home, but
whether they have money or not, they simply
don’t know where to turn for home-based
long-term care,” said Susan Reinhard of
AARP. “Ironically, people who can
afford home services are the ones most often
left in the dark.”
Wisconsin in the mid 1990s was the first to
set up what it called Aging and Disability
Resource Centers (ADRCs), well-advertised
storefronts that provide information and
advice on home care services, such as
bathing and dressing, meal preparation,
nursing, housekeeping and specialized
transportation.
Now, 42 other states, with the help of
federal grants, are following Wisconsin’s
lead.
The movement is part of a national effort to
help the elderly and those with mental and
physical handicaps maintain their
independence, while reducing the cost per
person of Medicaid and other long-term-care
assistance programs.|
Since 2004, the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
(HHS) has given states more than $42 million
in grants to create Wisconsin-style centers,
which now serve about 22 percent of the
population. Last month, 11 states – Alaska,
Arkansas, California, Florida, Georgia,
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, New Mexico, North
Carolina and Wisconsin – received additional
money to make centers available statewide.
Besides keeping seniors and the disabled
from being unnecessarily confined to nursing
facilities, home care programs can save
states billions on Medicaid, the federal and
state program that provides medical
assistance for the poor and
handicapped. That’s because home-based
long-term care costs up to half as much as
comparable nursing home care, according to
AARP.
The savings help states stretch their
Medicaid dollars and serve a larger
population, Reinhard explained. In addition,
states that help families make the most of
their own resources can minimize the need
for public assistance, she said.
But finding and helping people in need is
not an easy task.
Most people put off planning for long-term
care until a crisis strikes — a stroke, an
accident or the death of a spouse. As a
result, they often end up in nursing homes,
not knowing where else to turn. According
to a 2006 survey by HHS, seven out of 10
nursing home residents thought there were no
other options in their area.
That was true in the past, but since the
late 1980s, states have increased the
proportion of Medicaid dollars spent on
nursing home alternatives, making more
services available for those who choose to
stay at home. Last year, HHS provided states
$1.75 billion in Medicaid incentives to
continue funding home- and community-based
health care alternatives over the next five
years.
Still, most people are overwhelmed by the
dizzying array of home care providers and
don’t know what services they or their
family members need to live independently,
said Donna McDowell, Director of Wisconsin’s
Bureau of Aging and Disability Resources.
Wisconsin’s resource centers help people
determine what services they need and where
to find them, offering solutions as diverse
as hiring a housekeeper to give a family
caretaker a needed break to building a
wheelchair ramp, arranging transportation to
doctor’s appointments and signing up for
senior day-care programs, she said.
Just as important, the centers cut red tape
involved in Medicaid, Medicare and private
insurance coverage of long-term care.
“People are relieved to learn they’re not
the only ones who can’t figure out their
insurance coverage. We call them shoebox
cases because they often come in with a box
full of medical bills,” McDowell said.
Even before Wisconsin’s resource centers
were launched, the state employed so-called
benefit specialists to help people get their
medical bills paid. “Without a doubt, it has
been the most popular program for the
elderly for the past 20 years,” she said.
Funded solely with state dollars, the $6.5
million program nets $8 in mostly federal
benefits for every dollar spent. “That’s
money that goes right back into the state’s
economy,” McDowell noted.
While other states are now trying to
duplicate Wisconsin’s success, it will take
time, cautioned Donna Folkemer of the
National Conference of State Legislatures.
“The key is to set clear priorities by
figuring out what problems people are
experiencing. Then they need to coordinate
dozens of organizations to fulfill those
needs. It can’t all be done at once,” she
said.
In most states, case workers meet people in
a one-stop office, follow up by phone and
ultimately visit clients’ homes to help
determine what services are needed. Using
Web sites and mobile technology, ADRC
employees make arrangements for services
right from a person’s home, explained Joseph
Lugo of HHS. Caseworkers also stay in
contact with clients over time as their
needs change, he said.
Out of about $141 billion spent on long-term
care each year, some $58 billion is funded
by Medicaid, according to HHS. Medicare —
the federal health care program for the
elderly — pays about $28 billion,
individuals and families spend $51 billion
and the balance is paid by other public and
private assistance programs, according to
2005 HHS data.
Since 1992, the proportion of long-term care
provided by nursing homes has declined from
an average of about 89 percent to 76 percent
in 2005, according to HHS. States vary
widely in both the cost of nursing
facilities and the percentage of long-term
care provided in them. Alaska has the
highest nursing home cost at $196,735 per
year and Louisiana has the lowest rate at
$43,435, according to a MetLife survey.
Four states – Oregon, New Mexico, Alaska and
Vermont – spend 60 percent or more of their
Medicaid dollars on home-based care, while
Mississippi and the District of Columbia
spend less than 20 percent, according to
AARP.
Contact Christine Vestal at
cvestal@stateline.org.
|
State
spending on home-based long-term
care
Over
the last decade, states have shifted
Medicaid long-term care spending
from nursing homes to
home-and-community-based care.
Nursing home facilities can cost
more than twice as much as
home-based care. |
|

|
|
|
Oregon
|
70% |
|
New Mexico
|
67% |
|
Alaska
|
63% |
|
Vermont
|
60% |
|
Minnesota
|
59% |
|
Washington
|
58% |
|
Wyoming
|
54% |
|
California
|
53% |
|
Kansas
|
50% |
|
Maine
|
49% |
|
Colorado
|
44% |
|
Montana
|
43% |
|
Rhode Island
|
43% |
|
Texas
|
43% |
|
Idaho
|
42% |
|
New York
|
42% |
|
North Carolina
|
42% |
|
Wisconsin
|
42% |
|
West Virginia
|
41% |
|
Utah
|
40% |
|
Oklahoma
|
39% |
|
Massachusetts
|
38% |
|
Connecticut
|
37% |
|
Hawaii
|
37% |
|
Missouri
|
37% |
|
Nevada
|
37% |
|
South Dakota
|
37% |
|
U.S.
Average |
37% |
|
Maryland
|
36% |
|
Virginia
|
35% |
|
Iowa
|
34% |
|
Nebraska
|
34% |
|
New Hampshire
|
34% |
|
Arizona
|
32% |
|
South Carolina
|
31% |
|
Delaware
|
30% |
|
Michigan
|
30% |
|
Arkansas
|
29% |
|
Illinois
|
29% |
|
Kentucky
|
28% |
|
New Jersey
|
28% |
|
Florida
|
27% |
|
Alabama
|
26% |
|
Louisiana
|
25% |
|
Tennessee
|
25% |
|
Indiana
|
24% |
|
Pennsylvania
|
24% |
|
Georgia
|
23% |
|
North Dakota
|
23% |
|
Ohio
|
23% |
|
Mississippi
|
13% |
|
...
...
...