Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
How to Slow or Pay for the Increasing Costs
of Social Security and Medicare?
Raising the eligibility age and encouraging
more people over 65 to work are the two
least unpopular approaches
NEW YORK, March
11, 2011 /PRNewswire/
-- There is something close to a consensus
among economists and political leaders who
are willing to discuss the subject that, as
large numbers of Baby Boomers become 65 or
older, the government will have to modify
the Medicare and Social Security programs to
make them affordable.
Present trends they say are "unsustainable".
All the possible solutions to this problem
that have been discussed are unpalatable to
many people, but some are more unpopular
than others.
A new Harris Poll was designed
to measure which policies are more or less
unpopular, and what the public would prefer
if one or more of these policies had to be
implemented.
The results show that raising the
eligibility age for Social Security and
Medicare and encouraging more people to work
over the age of 65 are the least unpopular
policies. Raising taxes to pay for the
increased costs of these services is more
unpopular. Reducing Medicare and Social
Security benefits are the most unpopular
options.
These are some of the results of The
Harris Poll of
3,171 adults surveyed online between
February 14 and 21, 2011 by Harris
Interactive.
The main findings of the poll are:
When given five choices and asked what they
think should happen over the next five
years, the policies chosen by the most
people are encouraging more people over 65
to work (40%) and increasing the age of
eligibility for Social Security and Medicare
(37%);
Far fewer believe that we should increase
taxes (27%) to pay for these benefits, while
hardly anyone thinks we should reduce either
Medicare (11%) or Social Security benefits
(11%); and,
When asked which two of the five policy
options people would choose if they had to
pick two, the numbers increase but the rank
order of responses is the same. Encouraging
more older people to work (55%) tops the
list followed by increasing the age of
eligibility (51%). Increasing taxes (37%) is
in the middle of the list with only 10%
preferring to reduce either Social Security
or Medicare benefits.
Differences by age
There are sizable differences between the
preferences of older and younger
generations. Older people, particularly
those who are already 65 or older, but also
including Baby Boomers, are much more
supportive of both encouraging older people
to work and increasing the ages of
eligibility. Echo Boomers and Gen Xers (all
under 46) are less supportive of these
options.
Differences by party
There are some substantial differences
between the attitudes of people who support
different parties. While large numbers of
Republicans, Democrats and Independents
choose the two least unpopular options –
working longer and raising the age of
eligibility – there is (no surprise here) a
big difference in their support for
increasing taxes. When asked to pick two
choices fully 50% of Democrats, but only 21%
of Republicans and 38% of Independents
choose to raise taxes.
So What?
Even if many informed people think that
present cost trends are unsustainable it is
far from clear what the government will do
to address this issue or when. Medicare and
Social Security are notoriously tough issues
to tackle -- the proverbial third rail of
politics. But, as and when the issue is
addressed, it seems likely that the two
least unpopular options, and possibly some
tax increases, will be on the table for
discussion.
|
TABLE 1
WHAT SHOULD WE DO TO SOCIAL SECURITY
AND MEDICARE TO CONTROL BUDGET
DEFICIT?
"Because of the increase in life
expectancy, there will be many more
old people alive in ten and twenty
years time than ever before. As the
number of people over 65 increases
substantially, the cost of Social
Security and Medicare is likely to
increase a lot if we do not change
these programs. Which of the
following do you think we should do
in the next five years to control
the budget deficit?"
Base: All Adults |
|
|
|
Total |
Generation |
Party I.D. |
|
|
Echo
Boomers
(18-33) |
Gen. X
(34-45) |
Baby
Boomers
(46-64) |
Matures
(65+) |
Rep. |
Dem. |
Ind. |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Encourage many more people over 65
to work |
40 |
39 |
35 |
37 |
54 |
46 |
38 |
42 |
|
|
Increase the age at which one is
eligible for Social Security and
Medicare |
37 |
39 |
24 |
31 |
52 |
41 |
35 |
39 |
|
|
Increase taxes |
27 |
27 |
20 |
28 |
29 |
14 |
39 |
27 |
|
|
Reduce Medicare benefits |
11 |
16 |
14 |
8 |
4 |
15 |
7 |
10 |
|
|
Reduce Social Security benefits |
11 |
17 |
9 |
7 |
4 |
16 |
6 |
13 |
|
|
None of the above |
33 |
29 |
43 |
38 |
28 |
32 |
28 |
36 |
|
|
Note: Multiple responses allowed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 2
WHAT SHOULD WE DO TO SOCIAL SECURITY
AND MEDICARE TO CONTROL BUDGET
DEFICIT? - TREND
"Because of the increase in life
expectancy, there will be many more
old people alive in ten and twenty
years time than ever before. As the
number of people over 65 increases
substantially, the cost of Social
Security and Medicare is likely to
increase a lot if we do not change
these programs. Which of the
following do you think we should do
in the next five years to control
the budget deficit?"
Base: All Adults |
|
|
|
Total Jan 2010 |
Total
Feb 2011 |
Change 2010-2011 |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Encourage many more people over 65
to work |
47 |
40 |
-7 |
|
|
Increase the age at which one is
eligible for Social Security and
Medicare |
30 |
37 |
+7 |
|
|
Increase taxes |
21 |
27 |
+6 |
|
|
Reduce Medicare benefits |
9 |
11 |
+2 |
|
|
Reduce Social Security benefits |
9 |
11 |
+2 |
|
|
None of the above |
35 |
33 |
-2 |
|
|
Note: Multiple responses allowed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 3
WHAT WE SHOULD DO IF HAD TO PICK TWO
THINGS
"Most economists think that it is
inevitable that we will have to do
one or more of these things, whether
we like it or not. If you had to
pick two that we should do, which
two would you pick?"
Base: All Adults |
|
|
|
Total |
Generation |
Party I.D. |
|
|
Echo
Boomers
(18-33) |
Gen. X
(34-45) |
Baby
Boomers
(46-64) |
Matures
(65+) |
Rep. |
Dem. |
Ind. |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Encourage many more people over 65
to work |
55 |
45 |
57 |
60 |
66 |
59 |
53 |
58 |
|
|
Increase the age at which one is
eligible for Social Security and
Medicare |
51 |
47 |
41 |
48 |
73 |
60 |
49 |
52 |
|
|
Increase taxes |
37 |
33 |
33 |
43 |
36 |
21 |
50 |
38 |
|
|
Reduce Social Security benefits |
10 |
17 |
13 |
7 |
3 |
15 |
6 |
10 |
|
|
Reduce Medicare benefits |
10 |
14 |
12 |
10 |
3 |
15 |
9 |
8 |
|
|
None of the above |
14 |
16 |
20 |
13 |
7 |
12 |
11 |
15 |
|
|
Note: Multiple responses allowed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 4
WHAT WE SHOULD DO IF HAD TO PICK TWO
THINGS - TREND
"Most economists think that it is
inevitable that we will have to do
one or more of these things, whether
we like it or not. If you had to
pick two that we should do, which
two would you pick?"
Base: All Adults |
|
|
|
Total Jan 2010 |
Total Feb 2011 |
Change 2010-2011 |
|
|
% |
% |
% |
|
|
Encourage many more people over 65
to work |
61 |
55 |
-6 |
|
|
Increase the age at which one is
eligible for Social Security and
Medicare |
46 |
51 |
+5 |
|
|
Increase taxes |
31 |
37 |
+6 |
|
|
Reduce Social Security benefits |
10 |
10 |
- |
|
|
Reduce Medicare benefits |
12 |
10 |
-2 |
|
|
None of the above |
17 |
14 |
-3 |
|
|
Note: Multiple responses allowed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methodology
This Harris
Poll was
conducted online within the
United States between February
14 to 21, 2011 among
3,171 adults (aged 18 and over). Figures for
age, sex, race/ethnicity, education, region
and household income were weighted where
necessary to bring them into line with their
actual proportions in the population.
Propensity score weighting was also used to
adjust for respondents' propensity to be
online.
All sample surveys and polls, whether or not
they use probability sampling, are subject
to multiple sources of error which are most
often not possible to quantify or estimate,
including sampling error, coverage error,
error associated with nonresponse, error
associated with question wording and
response options, and post-survey weighting
and adjustments. Therefore, Harris
Interactive avoids the words "margin of
error" as they are misleading. All that can
be calculated are different possible
sampling errors with different probabilities
for pure, unweighted, random samples with
100% response rates. These are only
theoretical because no published polls come
close to this ideal.
Respondents for this survey were selected
from among those who have agreed to
participate in Harris Interactive surveys.
The data have been weighted to reflect the
composition of the adult population. Because
the sample is based on those who agreed to
participate in the Harris Interactive panel,
no estimates of theoretical sampling error
can be calculated.
These statements conform to the principles
of disclosure of the National Council on
Public Polls.
... ..
...
...