America's Seniors at www.TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
AddThis Feed ButtonNow, keep up to date with daily feeds of newly posted stories about America's Seniors...click on the box to the left
Election 2008...New! MSNBC Dashboard with continuous updates...information...stats...click here
 



 



728x90





 

 

Read our Blog, RxforAmericanHealth...Newest post... Pharma, allies disingenuous, practicing misdirection on real purposes of proposed legislation on sale of controlled substances over the Internet
 

Blacks Rely on SS
Bush Tries Again
Billions Overpaid
Bush Approval Drops
Bush Plan Lowers Benefit
Bush Appointee
Bush Attacks SS
COLA Important
Bush Budget Study
Bush Changes Stance
Bush Contributors Profit
Bush Vaccine Link
Bush Cuts
Bush Cuts Hurt Seniors
Bush Gives Up on SS
Bush Link
Bush Loses Credibility
Bush Misleads on SS
Bush Pays Pharma Back
Bush Plan Falls Short
Bush Plan Slips
Bush Politicizes SS
Bush Scam
Bush Snubs Seniors
Bush Stumbles
Bush to Privatize
Bush to Privatize SS
Congressional Notice
Direct Deposit Urged
Education Can Boost SS
Election Issue
Go Direct! Deposits
Golden Promise
GOP to Push Privatization
Horrendous Ploy
Illegal Immigrant Payments
Illegal Workers
Illusionary COLA 2007
Include Seniors in Plan
Not Pay SS Tax
No to Privatization
MO Call to End Tax
President Rebuked
Prevent SS Garnishment
Privatization Goal
Privatization Rapped
Sick Social Security
Social Security Deficit
Social Security FAQ
SS & Medicare
SS & 2004 Election
SS Broke 2042
2004 COL Increase
SS Earnings Limit Up
SS Privatization Harmful
SSA Longevity Table
2006 Trustees'  Report
Struggle Continues
Treaty Impact on SS
Value of SS
Women Receive Less
Work or Retire?
2006 COL SS
2008 COLA Insufficient
2008 Social Security COLA
2009 COLA Inadequate

Copyright (C) 
America's Seniors
TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
 

E-Mail us at
 America's Seniors

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

How sick is Social Security?

By Daniel Hines  
Editor/publisher, 
America's Seniors/TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com

How sick is Social Security?  That's the question asked recently by The Motley Fool, a must-read for people interested in investments.

The Fool avoids the political discussion of who is right and who is wrong about SS, but it is obvious that even with its disclaimer, The Fool believes that a heads-up is in order to policy-makers.

Here's the Fool's take on things:

"As they do every year, the trustees of the Social Security and Medicare trust funds released their annual report on whether you'll get anything in return for the 7.5% in FICA taxes taken out of each paycheck. Here are the results:

  • The reserves in the combined Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) and Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund will begin shrinking in 2017. By 2041, they will be gone (which is better than 2038 -- the depletion date projected last year).
  • The Hospital Insurance Trust Fund (part of the Medicare program) will begin paying out more than it takes in by 2016, which will deplete all reserves by 2030 (one year later than previously projected). "

As The Fool notes, this seems like a long time off.  For those of us in our early 60s, the odds are that none of this will affect us since if we are still around, it is unlikely that we will be able to do much with whatever funds might be left, anyway.

However, the definition of senior is changing.  One needs only to look at the Supreme Court which in ones of its most misguided judgments ever, was true to its conservative, pro-business leanings and ignored the obvious issue of age discrimination.

 

The Bush Administration's appointees to key posts also reflect the 'let them eat cake' philosophy with comments such as follows:

 

Paul H. O'Neill (Secretary of the Treasury), Elaine L. Chao (Secretary of Labor), Tommy G. Thompson (Secretary of Health and Human Services

  •  "Bringing Social Security into actuarial balance over the next 75 years could be achieved by either a permanent 13% reduction in benefits or a 15% increase in payroll tax income, or some combination of the two."

  • "Bringing HI into actuarial balance over the next 75 years could be achieved by either an immediate increase in payroll tax income of almost 70% (e.g., by raising the payroll tax rate from 1.45 to 2.46 % on both employers and employees) or an immediate reduction in program outlays of 38% from their currently projected levels, or some combination of the two."
Apparently giving up on their plans for privatization of Social Security (perhaps in light of the Enron scandal where private sector pirates enriched themselves at the expense of thousands), the Bush Administration is now figuring to implement other painful plans that, as we noted in an earlier Commentary, ensure that the 'fat man is always dancing while the thin man pays the band.'
 

Home
Up
About Us
America's Seniors WebMall
Aging News
California Report
Caregiving
Community/Workplace
Fitness,Health
Election 2008
Grandparents
Health Care Policy
Hispanic Seniors
Medicare News
Contents/Sitemap
Prescription Drugs
Pharma Suits
Restaurant Reviews
Rural Seniors
Safety & Security
Growing New Parts
Seniors Commentary
Seniors' Entertainment
Seniors Headlines
Seniors Finances
Seniors' Issues
Seniors Relationships
Seniors Rights
The Virtual Family
Travel News
TSN Radio on Web
Veterans' Tribute
White House Cards
Privacy Policy
Sitemap Contents
Consumer Alert

 

 

Copyright 1999-2008 TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
To Contact Us, Click Here