Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Seniors
Have Lost 32 Percent of Their Buying Power
Since 2000
2011 Annual Survey of Senior Costs Finds
Expenses Have Increased More Than Twice as
Fast as Social Security COLA
WASHINGTON, May 20, 2011 /PRNewswire/ --
Seniors have lost almost one-third of their
buying power since 2000, according to the
Annual Survey of Senior Costs, released
today by The Senior Citizens League (TSCL).
In most years, seniors receive a small
increase in their Social Security checks,
intended to help them keep up with the costs
of inflation. But since 2000, the Social
Security Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA)
has increased just 31 percent, while typical
senior expenses have jumped 73 percent, more
than twice as fast.
In 2011, for the second consecutive year,
seniors received no COLA. Prior to 2010,
seniors had received a COLA every year since
1975, when the automatic COLA was
introduced. Seniors are forecast to receive
a very small COLA next year.
The following table shows how various types
of expenses have changed since 2000. (Dollar
cost changes are included if that data is
available; otherwise, only the percent of
change is stated.)
|
C ategory |
E xpense |
C ost in 2000 |
C ost in 2011 |
P ercent Increase, 200 0-201 1 |
|
|
H ousing |
Ow nership costs |
N /A |
N /A |
32 % |
|
|
|
A partment rental |
N /A |
N /A |
39 % |
|
|
|
H omeo w ner's i nsurance (annua l ) |
$508 . 0 0 |
$969 . 0 0 |
91 % |
|
|
|
R eal estate tax (annual) |
$690 . 0 0 |
$1 , 275 . 9 6 |
85 % |
|
|
|
H eating
oil (gallon) |
$1 . 1 5 |
$3 . 3 4 |
190 % |
|
|
|
N atural gas (gallon) |
$1 . 0 1 |
$2 . 7 4 |
171 % |
|
|
|
E lectricity (per kw hr) |
$ . 0 8 |
$ . 1 2 |
50 % |
|
|
Transportation |
G as, all grades (gallon) |
$1 . 5 3 |
$3 . 5 3 |
131 % |
|
|
|
N ew & used vehicles |
N /A |
N /A |
(- 4 %) |
|
|
|
O il change |
$23 . 1 1 |
$49 . 6 8 |
115 % |
|
|
|
M aintenance/ repa i r |
N /A |
N /A |
44 % |
|
|
M edical |
T otal out- o f- po c k et m edical expenses |
$1 , 074 . 5 0 |
$1 , 526 . 1 8 |
42 % |
|
|
|
P rescription drugs, g e n eric, b ra nd , s pecial |
$623 . 7 0 |
$708 . 0 7 |
14 % |
|
|
|
D ental, general visits |
$377 . 4 0 |
$528 . 6 1 |
40 % |
|
|
|
M edicare Part B p remi u ms (m on t h l y ) |
$45 . 5 0 |
$115 . 4 0 |
154 % |
|
|
|
M e di ca re P a rt D p remi u ms |
$25 . 9 3 |
$40 . 7 2 |
57 % (si n ce 2006 ) |
|
|
F ood |
1 0 l b s. po tat o es |
$2 . 9 8 |
$5 . 9 8 |
101 % |
|
|
|
1 l b . bu tter |
$2 . 5 2 |
$3 . 4 2 |
36 % |
|
|
|
M ilk (gallon) |
$2 . 7 8 |
$3 . 3 0 |
19 % |
|
|
|
E ggs (dozen) |
$0 . 9 3 |
$1 . 8 1 |
95 % |
|
|
|
G round chuck (lb.) |
$1 . 9 0 |
$2 . 9 9 |
57 % |
|
|
|
B read, white loaf |
$ . 9 1 |
$1 .40 |
54 % |
|
|
|
1 l b . c o ffee |
$3 . 5 4 |
$4 . 4 2 |
25 % |
|
|
|
O ranges (lb.) |
$ . 6 1 |
$1 . 0 5 |
72 % |
|
|
R ecreation |
R ecreation, misc. |
N /A |
N /A |
10 % |
|
|
Communication |
F irst class postage |
$ . 3 3 |
$ . 4 4 |
33 % |
|
|
|
B asic phone service, l ocal |
$55 . 3 7 |
$ 68. 4 1 |
24% |
|
|
A pparel |
C lothing |
N /A |
N /A |
(- 8 %) |
|
|
O ther |
P ersona l care produc t s |
N /A |
N /A |
5 % |
|
|
|
P ersonal care services |
N /A |
N /A |
32 % |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"For many years, seniors have watched
helplessly as the value of their benefits
has eroded. Those losses have added up, and
millions of seniors – among our most
vulnerable citizens – are barely able to
scrape by today," said Larry Hyland,
chairman of The Senior Citizens League. "To
put it in perspective, for every$100 worth
of expenses seniors could afford in 2000,
they can afford just $68 today."
A senior with an average Social Security
benefit in 2000 received $816 per month, a
figure that rose to $1,072.30 by 2011.
However, that senior would require a Social
Security benefit of $1,414.70 per month in
2011 j us t t o ma i n t a i n h i s or her 2000 lif es t y l e.
The study examined the increase in costs of
30 key items between 2000 and 2011. The
items were chosen because they are typical
of the costs seniors must bear. Price
increases for 22 out of the 30 costs
exceeded the COLA. The selected items
represent eight categories, and each
category was weighted (based on typical
expenditure levels) in order to calculate
the overall loss of buying power.
A majority of the 37 million Americans aged
65 and over who receive a Social Security
check depend on it for at least 50 percent
of their total income, and one in three
beneficiaries rely on it for 90 percent or
more of their total income.
To help increase buying power, The Senior
Citizens League is lobbying for a change in
which Consumer Price Index (CPI) is used to
determine the COLA. The government currently
calculates the COLA based on the CPI for
Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers
(CPI-W), a slow-rising index that tracks the
spending habits of younger workers who don't
spend as much of their income on health
care.
The government does track the spending
patterns of older Americans, and has done so
since 1983 using the CPI for Elderly
Consumers (CPI-E). By tying the annual
increase in the COLA to the CPI-E, seniors
would see much-needed relief in their
monthly checks. For example, a senior who
retired with a benefit of$460 in 1984 would
have received $13,723 more over the past 27
years with the CPI-E.