New
Service for TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
readers...roll mouse over, click on
highlighted links in stories to review items
from Amazon
Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
FDA
posts names of Prescription Drugs being
investigated for potential Safety Problems
[Sep 08, 2008]
FDA
officials on Friday said the agency will
begin publishing quarterly a list of drugs
being investigated for potential safety
risks, the
Washington Post reports.
The
list, available on the FDA Web site,
names the drug and the nature of the related
"adverse event" but does not address the
severity or the number of such events
reported.
Appearing on the list does not mean a drug
has been found to be unsafe, according to
the Post. The new policy is required
under legislation passed last year.
Only drugs submitted to the agency's
Adverse Events Reporting System will be
included on the list. AERS received 482,154
unsolicited reports of potential drug
reactions last year but the "vast majority
were false alarms," the Post reports.
The agency also investigates drugs based on
data from clinical trials and other studies,
but such drugs will not appear on the list.
Gerald Dal Pan, an FDA official, said the
agency's "post-market surveillance" system
will not change but the agency will alter
the timing and extent to which the public is
informed regarding potential drug safety
risks.
He
said, "I think the public has told us in
recent years that 'we want to know what you
are working on.' We are telling the public
at pretty much the earliest stage what we
are working on" (Brown, Washington Post,
9/6).
Concerns
Although the list is intended to provide
consumers and health care professionals with
advance information on FDA investigations,
many experts -- including some inside the
agency -- have raised concerns that the
system could harm patients by causing
unneeded alarm.
The agency is aware of the possibility "that
people will stop taking a drug
inappropriately" because it appears on the
list, Paul Seligman, FDA associate director
of safety policy, said (Favole, Wall
Street Journal, 9/6).
According to the AP/Sentinel, "Consumer
advocates called the listing a positive
step, but said it needs to be fleshed out."
Thomas Moore, a senior scientist at the
Institute for Safe Medication Practices,
said, "It's a good thing to get started, but
it needs to have much more detail if it's to
have significant safety value.
A table with just a few words of description
is quite limited" (Alonso-Zaldivar,
AP/Orlando Sentinel, 9/6).
Drugmakers said that they support the new
policy but noted that the information is
being given to patients without necessary
context and questioned its value.
AstraZeneca spokesperson Tony Jewell
said, "It is very, very important that
patients and their physicians understand the
benefits and risks of the drug. To speak
about one without the other could have an
impact on patient perception of their
medications" (Wall Street Journal,
9/6).
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America expressed similar concerns about
the potential for the list to alarm patients
unnecessarily.
Janet Woodcock, director of FDA's
Center for Drug Evaluation and Research,
said, "My message to patients is this: Don't
stop taking your medicine. If your doctor
has prescribed a drug that appears on this
list, you should continue taking it unless
your doctor advises you differently" (AP/Orlando
Sentinel, 9/6).
FDA officials said they have not decided how
they will inform the public when a drug is
found to carry no safety risk (Washington
Post, 9/6).
First List
The first list, published Friday, names 20
drugs and includes a "wide array" of drug
types and numerous adverse reactions, the
Wall Street Journal reports.
FDA previously had announced safety
investigations for some of the drugs listed,
but for other treatments on the list it is
the first time their safety has been
questioned publicly (Wall Street Journal,
9/6).
The drugs heparin, for its link to severe
allergic reactions, and Cymbalta, for its
connection with urinary retention, were
included in the list, among others.
According to the Post, some of the
drugs included in the list were added
because of investigations into confusing
names or packaging, including
similar-sounding treatment names (Washington
Post, 9/6).
...
...
...