Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Research Explores Factors in Obesity
Newswise, September 2010 — South Dakota
State University researchers are using the
tools of spatial analysis to explore
nationwide data for insights on what
influences obesity.
“We can identify and map some of these
regions or ‘hotspots’ of high and low
obesity,” said associate professor Michael
Wimberly of SDSU’s Geographic Information
Science Center of Excellence. “Ultimately
what we want to do is explain what some of
the drivers are.”
SDSU postdoctoral researcher Akihiko Michimi,
who is working on the project with Wimberly,
said one glaring regional difference is that
the rate of obesity is high in much of the
rural South United States, but low in the
rural West and in New England states.
Michimi and Wimberly’s first journal article
about the study appeared June 29 in the American
Journal of Preventive Medicine.
The SDSU study set out to map spatial
patterns of obesity and risk factors
nationwide by using Behavioral Risk Factor
Surveillance System data from telephone
surveys compiled annually by the Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. The BRFSS
data includes self-reported height and
weight, as well as respondents’ answers to
questions about their levels of physical
activity, and about fruit and vegetable
consumption.
“The advantage of using BRFSS compared to a
variety of other data sources is that we can
get wall-to-wall national coverage. They
actually do sampling in every county across
the United States,” Wimberly said.
“So we
can map things, first of all, and we can
also use various spatial statistics to test
hypotheses about what the environmental
correlates of obesity, physical activity,
fruit and vegetable consumption are at a
national level as opposed to other studies
that have been more localized.”
For example, the SDSU analysis shows that
the rural South and parts of the Great
Plains had low proportions of people who are
physically active in their leisure time,
while the rural West, New England, and the
upper Midwest had high proportions.
When analyzing data for another factor — the
proportion of adults consuming fruits and
vegetables five times or more per day —
researchers found the West Coast, New
England and parts of the South had the
highest proportions. But the Lower
Mississippi Valley, the Great Plains and the
Mid-Appalachian Mountain region had low
proportions.
Michimi and Wimberly said a current idea in
research is that factors in society can set
up “obesogenic environments” that give rise
to obesity — if factors discourage physical
activity or encourage eating the wrong sorts
of food, for example.
One of the angles they’re currently
exploring in a follow-up study is the
possibility that distance from supermarkets
— a possible indicator of access to
nutritious foods rather than highly
processed, less healthful foods — could play
a role.
SDSU’s preliminary analysis of data from the
48 contiguous United States showed that the
probability of obesity increased with
distance from supermarkets, while
consumption of five or more servings of
fruits and vegetables per day decreased. The
research also showed clear differences
between large metropolitan areas and
sparsely populated rural areas.
“Sometimes people have to drive 25 or 30
miles to get to a supermarket or grocery
store,” Michimi said. “But big cities on the
East Coast or West Coast have a high
population density. If they have a large
number of people, they have a large number
of stores. So the distance to the
supermarkets in general is much, much
shorter compared to the distances to the
supermarkets on the Great Plains.”
Wimberly said there are no easy answers
about what’s responsible for obesity. But
analyzing it with the tools of geography
could make some less obvious factors
visible.
“The geographic perspective opens up a
unique window. Looking at maps, people
relate very intuitively to the patterns and
it really catalyzes a lot of new thought,
ideas, hypotheses. That’s the power of what
we refer to as ‘exploratory spatial data
analysis,’ working with the data using
statistical techniques that allow us to
tease out real spatial trends from the
underlying noise and using that as a method
for hypothesis generation. We can also pull
multiple sources of data together to
actually test hypotheses about the
underlying relationships.”
The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s
National Research Initiative funded the work
through a grant from its Human Nutrition and
Obesity Program.