Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Drug that
helps Metastatic Colon Cancer of no benefit
in Less Advanced Tumors
Newswise, June 2010 —To the surprise of
researchers at Mayo Clinic who led a
national clinical trial, a targeted therapy
that provides benefit to patients with
metastatic colon cancer has failed to help
patients with less advanced, stage III
cancer.
In fact, patients who used the agent,
cetuximab, with chemotherapy had outcomes
slightly inferior to patients treated with
chemotherapy alone.
The phase III
North Central Cancer Treatment Group
(NCCTG) study, sponsored by the
National Cancer Institute (NCI),
was closed to patient accrual in November
2009 after a planned interim analysis
demonstrating a lack of benefit from the
addition of cetuximab to standard
chemotherapy.
The first public discussion of the study and
results presented in a press conference June
6 at the annual meeting of the
American Society of Clinical Oncology
(ASCO).
In theory, many of the patients enrolled on
this trial should have benefited from the
addition of cetuximab to chemotherapy, says
Steven Alberts, M.D., the
Mayo Clinic oncologist who led
the clinical trial.
All of the patients enrolled in the trial
had colon cancers that had spread to the
nearby lymph nodes (stage III), but not
beyond. To be eligible for the trial,
patients first had to have the cancer
completely removed with surgery.
These patients also had a normal (wild-type)
KRAS gene in their tumor, which previously
has been shown necessary to have the
potential for cetuximab to work.
“The sum of data to date from trials for
metastatic colorectal cancer suggested that
cetuximab would provide benefit in these
stage III patients with KRAS wild-type
tumors, and so our findings are unexpected,”
Dr. Alberts says.
“It is difficult to understand how an agent
that helps patients with metastatic cancer
is not beneficial to those with less
advanced disease. At this point we are
focusing our efforts on identifying a
biological explanation for these findings.”
With more than 3,000 patients enrolled, the
study was one of the largest clinical trials
yet performed testing cetuximab with the
commonly-used FOLFOX chemotherapy following
surgery in patients with colon cancer.
It was expected that adding cetuximab to
FOLFOX would provide benefit in stage III
colon cancer patients, and would lead to
Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approval
for that indication, Dr. Alberts says.
Currently, the FDA has only approved
cetuximab for metastatic colon cancer and
the drug should continue to be used in that
setting as clinically appropriate, he says.
“Based on what we found, any use of
cetuximab in stage III colon cancer is not
supported by the results of our trial,” he
says.
According to Dr. Alberts, this is the only
U.S. study to have looked at the use of
chemotherapy and cetuximab in phase III
colon cancer patients, but a European
clinical trial is ongoing and first results
are expected next year.
The randomized clinical trial had multiple
arms, but the most important were the two
that tested FOLFOX with or without cetuximab.
This particular analysis looked only at the
1,864 enrolled patients with a normal KRAS
gene (909 treated with chemotherapy alone
and 955 patients treated with both drugs).
Based on a statistical analysis of the
outcomes at the three-year mark
post-treatment, the researchers found that
those treated with chemotherapy alone
(without cetuximab) had a 76 percent
disease-free survival (alive and with no
disease recurrence), compared to 72 percent
in patients who used both therapies. Overall
survival in all patients to date is also
better in patients who did not receive
cetuximab.
However, as this study was stopped early
after a median follow-up of approximately
two years, “Follow-up in regard to survival
is short at this point,” Dr. Alberts says.
The researchers also concluded that while
there were no differences in toxicity
between treatment groups in patients younger
than 70, there was increased toxicity as
well as greater differences in outcomes in
patients aged 70 and older.
The researchers have theories as to why
stage III colon cancer patients did not
benefit from cetuximab, but no evidence yet.
Two favored ideas are that cetuximab could
be switching on, or increasing activity, in
molecular pathways that promote cellular
growth, or could be creating resistance to
the effects of chemotherapy.
“The most critical question from this trial
is why a difference exists between patients
with stage III disease, where cetuximab is
not of benefit, and patients with metastatic
cancer, where cetuximab does provide
benefit,” Dr. Alberts says. “We aim to find
out.”
In addition to a grant from NCI, the study
received support from Bristol-Myers Squibb,
ImClone Systems, Sanofi-Aventis, and Pfizer.
The researchers declare no other potential
conflict of interest.
About Mayo Clinic
For more than 100 years, millions of people
from all walks of life have found answers at
Mayo Clinic.
These patients tell us they leave Mayo
Clinic with peace of mind knowing they
received care from the world’s leading
experts. Mayo Clinic is the first and
largest integrated, not-for-profit group
practice in the world. At Mayo Clinic, a
team of specialists is assembled to take the
time to listen, understand and care for
patients’ health issues and concerns.
These teams draw from more than 3,700
physicians and scientists and 50,100 allied
staff that work at Mayo Clinic’s campuses in
Minnesota, Florida, and Arizona; and
community-based providers in more than 70
locations in southern Minnesota, western
Wisconsin and northeast Iowa.
These locations treat more than half a
million people each year.
To best serve patients, Mayo Clinic works
with many insurance companies, does not
require a physician referral in most cases
and is an in-network provider for millions
of people.
... ..
...
...