Marital stress linked with slower wound healing
Newswise — Married couples who had higher levels of hostile
behaviors had slower healing times of blister wounds,
possibly because of the corresponding change in the level of
proinflammatory proteins in the blood, according to a study
in the December issue of Archives of General Psychiatry, one
of the JAMA/Archives journals.
Marital discord has been associated as a risk factor for
several illnesses, according to background information in
the article. Possible mechanisms have included changes in
blood pressure and endocrine levels. Stress has been linked
with a change in the production of proinflammatory
cytokines, proteins in cells that play a key role in wound
healing.
Janice K. Kiecolt-Glaser, Ph.D., of Ohio State University,
Columbus, and colleagues conducted a study to assess how
hostile marital behavior affected a health outcome, wound
healing, as well as the production of proinflammatory
cytokine. The study included 42 healthy married couples,
aged 22 to 77 years (average, 37 years old), married an
average of 12.6 years. Couples were admitted twice to a
hospital research unit for 24 hours. During the first
admission, couples had a structured social support
interaction, and during the second admission, they discussed
a marital disagreement. Couples rated their behavior and
responses. A vacuum pump was used to produce blisters on the
arm. The blister wound was examined several times over a 12
day period to determine the degree of healing and blood was
drawn to measure cytokine levels.
The researchers found that couples’ blister wounds healed
more slowly following marital conflicts than after social
support interactions. Couples who demonstrated consistently
higher levels of hostile behaviors across both their
interactions healed at 60 percent of the rate of low-hostile
couples and had a median (midpoint) time to healing of one
day longer.
Local cytokine production was lower at wound sites following
marital conflicts than after social support interactions.
High-hostile couples also produced relatively larger
increases in cytokine values the morning after a conflict
than after a social support interaction compared with
low-hostile couples.
“These changes are important because both stressors and
depression can sensitize the inflammatory response in such a
way that they produce heightened responsiveness to stressful
events as well as antigen challenge. Furthermore, more
frequent or persistent stress-related changes in plasma
levels of these key cytokines have broad implications for
health; elevated levels of proinflammatory cytokines have
been linked to a variety of age-related disease, including
cardiovascular disease, osteoporosis, arthritis, type 2
diabetes mellitus, certain cancers, and frailty and
functional decline. Moreover, inflammatory activation can
enhance development of depressive symptoms. Thus,
relationships characterized by hostility, repeated
conflicts, and heightened [cytokine] levels could have
negative consequences for both physical and mental health.
Indeed, our data are consistent with the growing
epidemiological evidence that marital stress is a risk
factor for mental and physical health,” the authors write.
“If chronically hostile or abrasive relationships produce
more frequent and more pronounced proinflammatory cytokine
changes, then individuals in troubled relationships could be
at greater risk over time,” the researchers conclude.