Democrats say Medicare
Handbook could be misleading for beneficiaries choosing 2007
coverage options, according to letter sent to HHS Secretary Leavitt
[Oct 27, 2006]--Senate and House Democrats this week in a letter to
HHS Secretary Mike Leavitt said that the Bush administration has
used a Medicare handbook on coverage options for beneficiaries to
promote Medicare Advantage plans, rather than to provide objective
information,
CQ HealthBeat reports.
The letter -- signed by Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Jay
Rockefeller (D-W.Va.) and Reps. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio), John
Dingell (D-Mich.), Charles Rangel (D-N.Y.) and Pete Stark
(D-Calif.) -- states that the handbook, which the
administration has mailed to 43 million beneficiaries,
promotes the cost savings associated with MA plans compared
with traditional Medicare but fails to inform beneficiaries
that the plans can require higher out-of-pocket costs.
According to the letter, a recent
Commonwealth Fund study "found that some MA plans charge as much
as $300 per day for hospital care and $5,600 for cancer
chemotherapy."
The letter adds, "For beneficiaries in poorer health who get
admitted to a hospital several times a year or need cancer care, MA
costs could be far higher" than traditional Medicare.
The letter also suggests that the handbook implies that changes in
Medicare prescription drug plan formularies can occur only "as a
result of changes in drug therapies or as new medical knowledge
becomes available," CQ HealthBeat reports.
However, according to the letter, Medicare prescription drug plans
"can and do change their formularies for business and other reasons,
and beneficiaries should know this.
" Although it is too late to change the handbook, according to CQ
HealthBeat, the letter adds that "equally biased and
problematic" language on the Medicare Web site "could be corrected
virtually overnight."
Reaction
CMS officials on Thursday in a statement said that they used
recommendations from various groups -- such as outside organizations
that help Medicare beneficiaries enroll in prescription drug plans
-- to prepare the handbook "in a clear, comprehensive and objective
manner."
HHS spokesperson Christina Pearson said that "throughout this
process, we've sought and incorporated input from those outside the
department and are always willing to consider constructive
suggestions." She added that the criticism of the handbook from
Democratic lawmakers "runs counter to the comments we've received
from hundreds of beneficiaries, organizations and officials" (Reichard,
CQ HealthBeat, 10/26).
Democratic Rx Drug Benefit Proposals
In related news, a report compiled by the Democratic staff of the
House Government Reform Committee has found that Democratic
proposals to revise the Medicare prescription drug benefit would
save the average beneficiary $500 annually and would eliminate
coverage gaps without an increase in cost for the federal
government, CQ HealthBeat reports.
According to the report, a Democratic proposal to allow Medicare to
negotiate directly with pharmaceutical companies for discounts on
medications would save almost 14 million beneficiaries more than $60
billion in premiums, copayments and other out-of-pocket costs.
Democratic proposals also would allow six million Medicare
beneficiaries to avoid the so-called "doughnut-hole" coverage gap in
which beneficiaries are responsible for 100% of annual prescription
drug costs between $2,250 and $5,100, the report found.
n
addition, more than one million Medicare beneficiaries would avoid
hundreds of dollars in late enrollment penalties under Democratic
proposals, according to the report. Pearson said that Medicare
beneficiaries currently save an average of $1,100 on their annual
medication costs under the prescription drug benefit.
In addition, she said that the
Congressional Budget Office and CMS actuaries have determined
that the proposal to allow Medicare to negotiate directly with
pharmaceutical companies for discounts on medications would not
reduce costs for beneficiaries.
Pearson also said that about 70% of Medicare beneficiaries with drug
coverage currently are enrolled in prescription plans with no
coverage gap and that about six million low-income beneficiaries pay
no premiums for their plans (CQ HealthBeat, 10/