GOP
blocks legislation that would allow Federal
negotiations of
Medicare Prescription Drug Prices
Apr 19, 2007--Senate Democrats on Wednesday
failed to obtain the 60 votes needed to begin to
debate legislation (S3)
legislation
(S
3)
that would allow the government to negotiate
prices with pharmaceutical companies under the
Medicare prescription drug benefit, the
Washington Post
reports (Murray,
Washington Post,
4/19).
The 55-42 vote for cloture included the support
of all Senate D
emocrats
and Republican Sens. Norm Coleman (Minn.), Susan
Collins (Maine), Chuck Hagel (Neb.), Gordon
Smith (Ore.), Olympia Snowe (Maine) and Arlen
Specter (Pa.) (Johnson,
CongressDaily,
4/19). Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.)
changed his vote to "nay" after it became clear
that the cloture vote was going to fail.
Voting against cloture and making a floor motion
to reconsider allows Reid to bring the bill back
for another vote in the future (Young,
The Hill,
4/19).
Senate Finance Committee
Chair Max Baucus (D-Mont.), a co-sponsor of the
bill, said, "It's beyond me why the Senate would
not choose to stand up for seniors."
Referring to more expansive House-approved
legislation (HR
4)
that would require the
HHS
secretary to negotiate Medicare drug prices,
Baucus said, "Concerns about a bill from the
House should not frighten senators into silence
on an issue this important" (Armstrong,
CQ Today,
4/18). Reid said, "The
Department of Veterans Affairs
is able to negotiate for lower-priced drugs.
HMOs can negotiate.
Wal-Mart
can negotiate. Why in the world shouldn't
Medicare be able to do that?"
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) criticized the
bill, saying it was "a step down the road to
a single-payer, government-run health care
system." Senate Finance Committee ranking
member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) said that HHS
"has had very little experience and a dismal
track record" at determining what to pay for
drugs, adding, "Private competition works"
(Pear,
New
York Times,
4/19).
Looking Ahead
"Few experts believe that the Senate vote will
quell demands for government intervention to
bring down drug prices," even though the
Medicare prescription drug benefit "has proved
popular, and it is costing less than initially
estimated," the
Los
Angeles Times
reports (Alonso-Zaldivar,
Los Angeles
Times, 4/19). Baucus said that
there "will be a time" to revisit the issue
(Henderson,
Boston
Globe,
4/19).
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said,
"Democrats will keep fighting until this bill is
signed into law and seniors and people with
disabilities have access to affordable
prescription drugs" (The
Hill, 4/19).
AARP,
which has lobbied in support of the bill, said,
"Senators should know this issue is not going
away. No amount of campaign money can trump the
will of 90% of Americans" (Freking,
AP/Detroit Free Press,
4/19).
Ken Johnson, senior vice president of the
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of
America
-- which opposes the legislation -- said, "This
issue is not going away." He added, "Every time
it pops up ... it gives us an opportunity to
remind Americans, as well as Congress, that the
Medicare prescription drug program has been a
resounding success so far" (The
Hill, 4/19).
The
Congressional Budget Office
has said that both the Senate and House
proposals "would have a negligible effect on
federal spending" unless the HHS secretary were
allowed to use a formulary or other tools to
lower prices. President Bush has said he would
veto either piece of legislation (New
York Times, 4/19).
Drug Prices Rising, Study Finds
In related news,
Families USA
on Wednesday released a study finding that
prices for the 15 most popular prescription
drugs provided by Medicare increased an average
of 9.2% during the last year at the nation's
five largest Medicare drug providers,
CQ
HealthBeat
reports. For the study, Families USA compared
the lowest drug prices charged by
United Healthcare,
Humana,
WellPoint-Unicare,
Member Health
and
WellCare
in April 2006 and April 2007. The findings are
based on prices that the insurers reported to
CMS.
Ron Pollack, executive director of Families USA,
in the release said, "Contrary to promises made
last year by the administration, Medicare Part D
prices skyrocketed last year, ... making drugs
increasingly unaffordable for seniors and ...
fleecing America's taxpayers." CMS spokesperson
Jeff Nelligan in a statement said that the
report "neglects the generous cost-sharing
assistance provided by the Part D benefit and
contradicts other analyses which suggest that
Part D has insulated Medicare beneficiaries from
real increases in drug prices."
Nelligan added that "90% of beneficiaries are
enrolled in Part D plans with flat copays that
are locked in for the year" (Carey,
CQ HealthBeat,
4/18).
Broadcast Coverage
Three broadcast programs reported on the Senate
vote. Summaries appear below.
American
Public Media's "Marketplace":
The segment includes comments from Bob Laszewski
of
Health Policy and Strategy Associates,
Drew Nannis of
AARP
and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) (Palmer,
"Marketplace," American Public Media, 4/18).
Audio and a transcript of the segment are
available
online.
C-SPAN's
"Washington
Journal":
The segment includes a discussion with Sen.
Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) ("Washington Journal,"
C-SPAN, 4/19). Video of the segment is available
online.
NPR's
"All
Things Considered":
The segment includes comments from Baucus,
Grassley, Snowe, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) and
Wyden (Rovner, "All Things Considered," NPR,
4/18). Audio of the segment is available
online.