Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Examining
the Health Consequences of the 2008-09
Recession
Newswise — The Bureau of Labor Statistics just announced a
jump in the jobless rate, from 6.8 percent
in November to 7.2 percent in December. This
indicates that there is further growth in
the ranks of the uninsured. As many as half
a million people may lose their health
coverage as a result of last month’s job
losses.
A new report by The George Washington University School of
Public Health and Health Services (GW/SPHHS)
spells out the potential health consequences
of this, and other aspects of the recession.
It also reviews proposals that are part of
federal efforts to stimulate an economic
recovery, and that would help to reduce
impoverishment, strengthen access to health
care, and protect the health of more
Americans.
The links between income and health are clear –
higher-income people live longer, with less
disease and disability, than lower-income
people. Research also shows that:
• In recent months a rising number of Americans have failed
to obtain medical care because of its cost,
cut back on preventive care, and skimped on
their medication.
• For every one percent rise in joblessness
more than one million people join the ranks
of the uninsured. People who are uninsured
receive poorer medical care, are less likely
to get recommended screenings and other
prevention services, and are more likely to
delay physician visits, neglect chronic
conditions, and incur medical debt.
• When joblessness jumps by one percent, states add about
one million more people to the rolls of
Medicaid and the State Children’s Insurance
Program (SCHIP), putting increased pressure
on their already tight budgets. Many states
are cutting their Medicaid programs despite
evidence that it is an economic, efficient,
and resilient form of health insurance
coverage.
• Families are being forced to choose among competing
demands for food, home energy, and health
care. Families that are “food insecure” or
“energy insecure” are more likely to have
children in poorer health.
The most effective economic recovery package will increase
protections to vulnerable families and put
money into the hands of people most likely
to spend it quickly. Policymakers are
considering:
• Increasing federal contributions to state Medicaid
programs to assure that states maintain
their eligibility levels.
• Expanding SCHIP to reach more children.
• Increasing benefits through the Supplemental Nutritional
Assistance Program (formerly called the Food
Stamp Program). This program serves as the
link between food insecurity and health and
is an important engine of economic growth.
• Expanding home energy assistance. The federal Low Income
Home Energy Assistance Program reaches only
about 16 percent of eligible families,
despite its demonstrated benefits to child
health.
• Extending unemployment insurance. The incoming Director
of the Office of Management and Budget calls
unemployment insurance one of the most
effective economic stabilizers available to
counter economic weakness.
• Providing health insurance temporarily for recently
laid-off workers and their families. One
approach is to underwrite the costs of COBRA
health insurance coverage, which is
currently available to people who have lost
their jobs only if they were previously
covered and can afford the premiums. Another
strategy is to widen Medicaid coverage to
those who are not currently poor enough to
qualify, but still can not afford health
insurance on their own.
Targeting individuals and families suffering from the
consequences of the downturn, and helping to
stabilize and revitalize their communities
may begin to reverse the health consequences
of the recession.
... ..
...
...