Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
New letter
to Rangel, Waxman, Miller from National
Seniors Coalition outlines concerns with
House Tri-Committee Health Reform Bill
Discussion Draft as proposed will cut $44.9
Billion in Nursing Home Funding over ten
years, threatening care and jeopardizing
jobs
JOPLIN, Mo., July 8 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
-- In a new letter to the three key leaders
shaping the developing U.S. House of
Representatives' health reform bill - Ways
and Means Chairman Charles Rangel (D-NY),
Energy and Commerce Chairman Henry Waxman
(D-CA) and Education and Labor Chairman
George Miller (D-CA) - the Coalition to
Protect Senior Care (CPSC) expressed concern
that the legislative discussion draft, as
now proposed, could harm seniors' care, cut
thousands of key frontline care jobs, and
undermine the ability to sustain quality
improvement programs already benefiting
patients nationwide.
"As front-line caregivers - those who
provide nearly 80 percent of direct patient
care in America's nursing homes - we at the
Coalition to Protect Senior Care (CPSC) are
writing to ask for your help in ensuring
that the health care reform debate now at
hand stay focused on the fact that adequate,
stable Medicare funding and patient outcomes
go hand in hand," says the letter to Reps.
Rangel, Waxman and Miller.
"From our perspective, what is at stake in
this debate is the ability of facilities to
maintain sufficient workforce levels, to
sustain comprehensive quality improvement
programs, and to continue caring for our
patients and residents now, and in the
future."
Lisa Cantrell, a co-founder of the National
Association of Health Care Assistants (NAHCA),
and a national spokesperson for the CPSC,
pointed out that while the Coalition
strongly supports comprehensive health care
reform and shares the House leaders' goals
for change, "We are concerned that the
current discussion draft limits nursing
homes' role in health care reform only to
that of a 'pay for,' and that the impact of
such drastic reductions will be felt all the
way to the frontline of care for our
nation's most vulnerable elderly."
In its letter to Rangel, Waxman and Miller,
the CPSC refers to a new analysis by Avalere
Health LLC which finds the draft House
legislation will cut Medicare nursing home
funding by $44.9 billion over ten years.
Continues the letter: "Compounding the
impact of health care reform cuts is the
proposed rule that the Centers for Medicare
& Medicaid Services (CMS) is expected to
finalize by August 1, which will cut $16
billion in Medicare funding over 10 years.
"The
interactive effects of the Tri-Committee
draft and CMS' proposed regulation would
effectively drop Medicare payments by as
much as $53 billion over ten years, an
average loss of more than two years' worth
of Medicare revenue for every nursing home
in America.
"We
worry that Medicare funding cuts in the
proposed rule could turn back the clock on
the quality improvements that we have worked
so hard to achieve."
Cantrell said it is highly noteworthy that
there is widespread, bi-partisan support for
rescinding the proposed CMS rule as
evidenced by effort led by U.S. Reps.
Shelley Berkley (D-NV), Earl Pomeroy (D-ND)
and Shelly Moore Capito (R-WV) -- which
garnered 122 signatures from U.S. House
members who wrote to Health & Human Services
(HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius urging the
Administration to reject the proposed
Medicare regulation.
"We are asking you to keep what is best for
patients and caregivers in mind and to
consider together the impact of legislative
reform policies and regulatory policies that
could have serious, albeit unintended
negative consequences," Cantrell continued.
The CPSC spokeswoman also said a key
underlying reality surrounding the funding
debate is the fact that seventy percent of
nursing home costs are labor related, and
Medicare cuts of the magnitude proposed
would risk 50,000 nursing home-specific jobs
in 2010 alone, according to a recent
analysis by the American Health Care
Association (AHCA).
"Since women fill 95 percent of long term
care jobs and minorities comprise 30 percent
of our workforce, the proposed cuts would
heavily affect minority workers, inhibit
ongoing quality improvement efforts, and
also limit providers' ability to offer
valuable benefits to employees, including
subsidized health insurance coverage," she
continued.
"Reforming the nation's healthcare system
cannot possibly include jeopardizing the
quality of care delivered to America's
seniors by greatly reducing an already
stretched workforce that has more than
50,000 vacancies needing to be filled
today."
Cantrell said adequate funding for Medicare
is made more urgent by the fact that two
thirds of nursing home elderly are Medicaid
beneficiaries and Medicaid is chronically
underfunded by as much as $4 billion a year.
"This
gap has widened despite Congress' efforts to
provide additional Medicaid funding in the
stimulus bill, since many states slashed or
froze payments to nursing homes anyway," she
pointed out.
"From a frontline caregiver standpoint, the
challenge of caring for patients with
increasingly complex medical conditions in a
healthcare setting that stands to lose
billions upon billions in funding is
daunting at best."
Concludes the letter: "We are now asking
that as Congress and the Administration
attempt to overhaul our nation's healthcare
system that you remain aware of the noble
and worthy mission caregivers in nursing
homes fulfill each day in effectively caring
for the needs of America's seniors and
people with disabilities.
We respectfully ask that final House
healthcare reform legislation enhance and
improve on the current long term care system
in our country through adequate funding that
supports sufficient staffing levels --
achievements that cannot be realized with
the currently proposed Medicare cuts to
nursing homes and CMS' proposed rule."
The complete text of the letter to Reps.
Rangel, Waxman and Miller is available at
www.coalitiontoprotectseniorcare.org .
The Coalition to Protect Senior Care
consists of the American Association for
Long Term Care Nursing (AALTCN); the
American College of Health Care
Administrators (ACHCA); the American
Association of Nurse Assessment Coordinators
(AANAC); the National Rural Health
Association (NRHA); The American Association
of Nurse Assessment Coordinators (AANAC) the
American College of Health Care
Administrators (ACHCA); the American
Physical Therapy Association (APTA); the
American Society of Health Care
Administration Executives (ASHCAE); ASHCAE
state affiliate members representing
Arizona, Arkansas, Colorado, Idaho, Iowa,
Kansas, Maine, New Hampshire, New Mexico,
New York, North Dakota, Oregon, Texas and
Utah; the American Health Care Association (AHCA);
the American Health Quality Association (AHQA);
the National Association for the Support of
Long Term Care (NASL); the National
Association of Health Care Assistants (NAHCA);
the Alliance for Quality Nursing Home Care;
and the Senior Clinician Group.
Source:
Coalition to Protect Senior Care
... ..
...
...