Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Fix
Supreme Court trashing of Anti-Age
Discrimination Laws; Bob Weiner, Former
House Aging Committee Director urges action
before Election Adjournment; Miami Herald
Op-ed
WASHINGTON, June 24, 2010 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/
-- "The increasingly pro-big business
Supreme Court has taken away seniors' power
against employment discrimination and given
it to business," asserts former House Aging
Committee Chief of Staff Robert Weiner.
"Pending congressional legislation, with
hearings on it just completed, could
overturn the Supreme Court's decision and
shift the burden of proof back to the
employer."
Congress is now deciding what bills to pass
before the election adjournment, and Weiner
contends that "seniors and disabled citizens
seniors and handicapped citizens in Florida
and across the nation should support this
major legislative fix."
In an op-ed in the Miami Herald, "Fix
Court's Trashing of Anti-Age Discrimination
Act," Weiner and policy analyst Yusuf Hassan
quote the late Congressman Claude Pepper
(D-Miami), former Chairman of the House
Aging Committee, who said: "Ageism is as
odious as racism and sexism." He led passage
of the anti-mandatory retirement acts of
1978 and 1986.
However, according to Weiner and Hassan,
"Age discrimination complaints rose by an
astounding 30% last year. Companies are
taking out the economic crisis on their
older workers."
"Last summer, a 5-to-4 Supreme Court ruling
made it more difficult for working seniors
to win age-discrimination lawsuits under a
law that bans employers from discriminating
against workers 40 or older.
"A jury awarded a 54 year-old worker $47,000
in lost compensation, but the U.S. Court of
Appeals reversed the verdict, asserting that
the jury made an 'error' in shifting the
burden of proof from the worker to the
company. The Supreme Court upheld the
Appeals Court, laying the burden on the
older employee for challenges to demotion or
termination. The Appeals Court made the
problem even worse - it extended the Age
Discrimination ruling to the Americans with
Disabilities Act. Now, for both older and
handicapped workers, employers can continue
to use vague phrases such as
're-structuring' to mask intentions."
The House Judiciary and Labor committees,
led by Reps. John Conyers (D-MI) and George
Miller (D-CA), and Senate Labor and Pensions
Committee under Sen. Tom Harkin (D-IA), just
completed hearings on legislation, the
Protecting Older Workers Against
Discrimination Act, to overturn the Supreme
Court's decision.
... ..
...
...