Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Aggressive, personalized treatment results
in increased survival rates in Kidney Cancer
Newswise — A study of nearly 1,500 patients
treated for kidney cancer at UCLA in the
last 15 years shows that an aggressive,
tailored treatment approach results in
better survival rates and uncovered subsets
of kidney cancer that behave differently and
need to be treated accordingly.
The one-size-fits-all approach traditionally
used in kidney cancer treatment should be
changed based on the results of the study,
the longest to date to analyze kidney cancer
patients and their outcomes, said Dr. Arie
Belldegrun, senior author of the study, a
professor of urology and a researcher at
UCLA’s Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center.
“This is the most important work that we’ve
done out of the kidney cancer program at
UCLA,” Belldegrun said. “We outline the
foundation for personalized kidney cancer
therapy.
"We
have shown that not all kidney cancer
patients are the same, not all localized
kidney cancers are the same and not all
metastatic kidney cancers are the same.”
The study appears in the Nov. 1, 2008 issue
of Cancer, the peer-reviewed journal of the
American Cancer Society.
The study found that patients with localized
kidney cancer, cancer that has not spread to
other organs, could have either low,
intermediate or high risk cancers based on
the chance for recurrence.
Patients with cancers that have already
spread also fell into similarly different
subsets. Some have better outcomes while
others may have very aggressive cancers that
may not warrant treatment.
“We showed for the first time, using an
integrated staging system developed at UCLA,
that we can identify which patients with
localized disease fall into the low,
intermediate and high risk subsets and which
patients with metastasized cancers are
either low, intermediate or high risk
patients,” Belldegrun said. “Now we can make
treatment decisions based on that.”
If a patient with localized cancer is
identified as low risk, his five-year
survival rate is expected to be 97 percent,
while his 10-year survival rate is 92
percent.
An intermediate risk patient with localized
disease would have a five-year survival rate
of 81 percent and a 10-year survival rate of
61 percent.
A high risk patient has a five-year survival
rate of 62 percent, with a 10-year survival
of 41 percent.
“All of these patients with cancers that
have not spread present to their doctors
with presumably localized disease and in the
past they may have been treated the same
way,” Belldegrun said. “They need to be
treated individually according to their risk
levels.”
The study showed that a patient with
low-risk, localized kidney cancer could be
treated only with surgery and expect an
excellent outcome. Such a move would spare
the patient from having to undergo radiation
or immunotherapy, which result in harsh side
effects.
However, for a patient with high-risk,
localized kidney cancer, surgery would not
be enough.
Additional therapy such as targeted
treatments or immunotherapy should be
considered in order to give the patient the
best possible outcome.
In metastatic patients, someone with
low-risk cancer should get very aggressive
treatment, Belldegrun said, because there’s
a good chance the therapy will help the
patient.
Those with high-risk, metastatic disease
won’t get much, if any, benefit from
treatment and may want to forego surgery and
the toxic therapies.
“Our paper identifies, very precisely, which
patients should get which therapies,”
Belldegrun said.
The study represents 15 years of experience
in UCLA’s leading-edge kidney cancer
program, an interdisciplinary approach to
treating cancer that brings together medical
oncologists, urologists, surgeons, clinical
trials experts and scientists under one
roof, a concept that was first
conceptualized at UCLA.
The study analyzed the first 1,492 patients
treated in the program and “demonstrated
that outstanding results can be achieved
using this approach,” Belldegrun said.
About 25 percent of the patients with
metastatic kidney cancer achieved long-term
responses – five to 15 year survivals – from
their therapy, Belldegrun said.
Less than 5 percent of metastatic kidney
cancer patient typically achieve long term
survivals or a cure when treated with
conventional treatments.
“This is by far the best survival data in
such a difficult group of patients,”
Belldegrun said.
“This can be achieved today only in kidney
cancer centers of excellence like we are
operating at UCLA, where we have all the
expertise at hand, the best scientists,
clinicians and surgeons working together.”
The results of the study come as new
targeted therapies are being introduced
specifically for kidney cancer.
The U.S. Food & Drug Administration has
recently approved three such drugs.
Belldegrun said the survival rates detailed
in their paper should be used as a benchmark
to which these new therapies should be
compared.
“While the field of kidney cancer is
undergoing dramatic changes it is as yet
still unclear how these changes are
affecting patient outcome,” the study states
“A critical assessment of the potential
improvement in the new treatment era
necessitates a comparison to a known
benchmark.
"We
present long-term, single institution data
to provide a thorough understanding of the
results that have been achieved until now
using a consistent, aggressive approach for
localized and metastatic disease.
"For future patient care, it will be
important to select patients that will do
best using existing therapies, and those who
should be treated using the newly approved
treatments.”
Other lead investigators on the study
include Dr. Fairooz Kabbinavar, medical
director of the kidney cancer program at
UCLA and a professor of hematology/oncology,
and Dr. Allan Pantuck, director for
translational research and an associate
professor of urology. Both are scientists
with the Jonsson Cancer Center.
UCLA's Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center
comprises about 235 researchers and
clinicians engaged in disease research,
prevention, detection, control, treatment
and education.
One
of the nation's largest comprehensive cancer
centers, the Jonsson center is dedicated to
promoting research and translating basic
science into leading-edge clinical studies.
In July 2008, the Jonsson Cancer Center was
named among the top 10 cancer centers
nationwide by U.S. News & World Report, a
ranking it has held for nine consecutive
years. For more information on the Jonsson
Cancer Center, visit our website at
http://www.cancer.ucla.edu.
...
...
...