Women often opt to surgically remove their
Breasts, Ovaries to reduce Cancer Risk
Newswise — Many women at high risk for
breast or ovarian cancer are choosing to
undergo surgery as a precautionary measure
to decrease their cancer risk, according to
a report in Cancer Epidemiology,
Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of
the American Association for Cancer
Research.
“Women have their breasts or ovaries removed
based on their risk. It does not always
happen immediately after counseling or a
genetic test result and can take more than
seven years for patients to decide to go
forward with surgery,” said lead researcher
D. Gareth Evans, M.D. Evans is a consultant
in clinical genetics at the Genesis
Prevention Center, University Hospital of
South Manchester NHS Trust and a professor
at the University of Manchester, United
Kingdom.
Evans and colleagues assessed the increase
in risk-reduction surgery among women with
breast cancer and evaluated the impact of
cancer risk, timing and age.
Rate of increase was measured among 211
women with known unaffected BRCA1 or BRCA2
mutation carriers.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 are hereditary gene
mutations that indicate an increased risk
for developing breast cancer.
Additionally, more than 3,500 women at
greater than 25 percent lifetime risk of
breast cancer without mutations also had a
documented increase in risk-reduction
surgery.
Women who had a biopsy after undergoing risk
evaluation were twice as likely to choose a
risk-reducing mastectomy.
Forty percent of the women who were mutation
carriers underwent bilateral risk-reducing
mastectomy; 45 percent had bilateral
risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy
(surgical removal of ovaries).
These surgeries are widely used by carriers
of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutations to reduce
the risk for breast and ovarian cancer.
Evaluated by gene type, bilateral
risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy was more
common in women who were BRCA1 gene carriers
— 52 percent had the surgery compared with
28 percent of the women who were BRCA2 gene
carriers.
“We found that older women were much less
likely to have a mastectomy, but were more
likely to have their ovaries removed,” said
Evans.
Most of the women, specifically those aged
35 to 45 years, opted for surgery within the
first two years after the genetic mutation
test, but some did not make a decision until
seven years later.
“This is a very interesting study. It
fleshes out some of what we know about
adoption of risk reduction strategies in
high-risk women who have participated in a
very comprehensive and well thought-out
genetic counseling, testing and management
program,” said Claudine Isaacs, M.D., an
associate professor of medicine and
co-director of the Fisher Center for
Familial Cancer Research, Lombardi
Comprehensive Cancer Center at Georgetown
University.
BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers have a
very high lifetime risk of cancer, and for
BRCA1 carriers there are unfortunately no
clearly proven non-surgical prevention
strategies, according to Isaacs.
These women face a 50 to 85 percent lifetime
risk of breast cancer, and mastectomy is
currently the most effective prevention
method available.
The findings confirm the expectations that
when a woman has a biopsy, even if benign,
most are more likely to opt for
risk-reduction surgery.
“Screening should be conducted at a place
with expertise in an effort to minimize
false-positive results, which often lead to
biopsy. This will minimize the anxiety that
comes along with such a diagnosis. Patients
should consult with an expert in advance and
stay in contact with them to see how the
science may be changing over time,” she
advised.
“This is an ongoing conversation that needs
to be addressed and individualized for each
patient.”
Likewise, Evans suggested that additional
studies are needed to help evaluate the
communication efforts and methods between
doctors and/or counselors and women at risk
for breast cancer.
Questions to be raised should include how is
the communication method occurring, are the
doctors sympathetic and is there an ongoing
dialogue?
“Careful risk counseling does appear to
influence women’s decision for surgery
although the effect is not immediate,” the
researchers wrote.
The mission of the American Association for
Cancer Research is to prevent and cure
cancer.
Founded in 1907, AACR is the world’s oldest
and largest professional organization
dedicated to advancing cancer research.
The membership includes more than 28,000
basic, translational and clinical
researchers; health care professionals; and
cancer survivors and advocates in the United
States and nearly 90 other countries.
The AACR marshals the full spectrum of
expertise from the cancer community to
accelerate progress in the prevention,
diagnosis and treatment of cancer through
high-quality scientific and educational
programs. It funds innovative, meritorious
research grants.
The AACR Annual Meeting attracts more than
17,000 participants who share the latest
discoveries and developments in the field.
Special
conferences throughout the year present
novel data across a wide variety of topics
in cancer research, treatment and patient
care.
The AACR publishes six major peer-reviewed
journals: Cancer Research; Clinical Cancer
Research; Molecular Cancer Therapeutics;
Molecular Cancer Research; Cancer
Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention; and
Cancer Prevention Research.
The AACR also publishes CR, a magazine for
cancer survivors and their families, patient
advocates, physicians and scientists.
CR provides a forum for sharing essential,
evidence-based information and perspectives
on progress in cancer research, survivorship
and advocacy.