The
Missouri Association for Social Welfare lays out
facts, makes case to increase food stamp benefit
to Missouri seniors...Hunger
facts from the Missouri Association for Social
Welfare
|
For many of Missouri's elderly, a
$10 subsidy for food stamps means
empty grocery carts |
Did you know . . .
• The US Department of Agriculture estimated
that an average of approximately 274,014
households in Missouri (or 11.7 of all
households) had trouble affording food from 2003
to 2005?
• 54% of food pantry clients in Mid-Missouri
have children and 2% of these households include
both adults over the age of 65 and children?
-Survey by University of Missouri, 2005
• According to the USDA, 6% of elderly
households in the United States in 2005 had
trouble affording food.
FACT SHEET ON HOUSE BILL 454: SUPPLEMENTAL FOOD
STAMPS GOOD FOR MISSOURI SENIORS – GOOD FOR
MISSOURI
• The minimum Food Stamp benefit of $10 was set
in 1974 and has not been adjusted to account for
inflation or other factors. Today, $25 of food
stamps can only purchase the amount of food that
$10 would have bought in 1974. Thus, the minimum
Food Stamp benefit is woefully inadequate for
many elderly Food Stamp recipients who often
live on a fixed income, such as Supplemental
Security Insurance (SSI) benefits or retirement
benefits.
• In Missouri, 47,000 households with elderly
people are receiving Food Stamps (16.1 percent
of all Food Stamp households in Missouri). It is
estimated that 5,341 elderly one-person
households received the minimum benefit in
Fiscal Year 2005 and that approximately 400
elderly two-person households received the
minimum benefit in Fiscal Year 2005.
• It is difficult for these elderly households
to cover rent, medical care, utilities and still
pay for food on a meager income. $10 per month
in food stamp benefits will not make any
appreciable difference in these households’
financial difficulties – many of whom have high
medical expenses – and does little to alleviate
their difficult financial circumstances.
Implementing a state-funded supplemental food
stamp program will help to remedy this situation
for many elderly Missourians.
• The elderly population is the fastest growing
segment of America’s population and elderly
individuals often have special dietary and
health needs. The minimum food stamp benefit may
not meet these dietary needs, thereby causing
health problems resulting from inadequate
nutrition. In addition, these seniors who
receive the minimum food stamp benefit
“sometimes have to choose between paying for
health care and paying for food.” By increasing
the minimum amount of food stamps for poor
elderly Missourians, House Bill 454 would
provide a positive boost to elderly individuals
who need help with purchasing food.
• Implementing supplemental food stamp benefits
in Missouri will increase participation in the
federal Food Stamp Program among needy elderly
individuals. In FY 2004, only about 28.4 percent
of eligible elderly people were participating in
the federal Food Stamp Program across the
country. Repeated testimony before the USDA
during the Farm Bill forums revealed that the
minimum food stamp benefit is often a deterrent
to those that need help with purchasing food.
House Bill 454 would remove this deterrent and
encourage more seniors to apply for nutrition
assistance through the federal food stamp
program.
• Because federal food stamp benefits are 100
percent federally funded, the legislation would
have the additional benefit of bringing more
federal resources into Missouri. These federal
dollars generate economic benefits for state and
local economies. USDA indicates that every $5 in
Food Stamps generates $9.20 in economic
activity. Moreover, $1 billion of “retail food
demand” by food stamp recipients generates 3,300
farm jobs. In fact, the Food Stamp Program
pumped $737.6 million into the Missouri economy
in 2005, resulting in an estimated $1.36 billion
of economic activity and benefiting farmers,
grocers, and small businesses throughout the
state. It is reasonable to expect that the
supplemental food stamps would have a similar
economic impact in Missouri.