Cancer vaccines: Taking a jab at Cancer by
stimulating the immune system
Newswise — As the first
FDA-approved cancer vaccine, designed to protect
against human papillomavirus, has moved from
scientific discussion to social debate, other
vaccine studies are continuing to make progress.
While HPV vaccine efforts had the “benefit” of a
viral source for the disease, other researchers
are developing vaccines for cancers that are not
virally based, in an effort to coax the immune
system into attacking cancerous cells.
Today at the 2007 Annual
Meeting of the American Association for Cancer
Research, presentations on ongoing HPV trials
and other new approaches to stimulating the
immune system are injecting momentum into cancer
vaccine research.
Ongoing evaluation of a
phase II trial of a human papillomavirus
vaccine, developed to prevent cervical cancer,
shows that the vaccine continues to protect
against HPV types 16 and 18 at five and a half
years into the study, according to researchers
from the University of Louisville. Their
findings also show that the vaccine offers
significant cross-protection for HPV types 45
and 31.
The study follows 1113
women between the ages of 15 and 25 in North
America and Brazil randomized to receive
three doses of either the vaccine or the
control. The vaccine, made by
GlaxoSmithKline, which funded the study, is
designed to protect against two strains of
HPV, types 16 and 18, which together are
thought to cause nearly 72 percent of all
cases of cervical cancer.
At over five years into the
study’s follow-up, the researchers found that
approximately 98 percent of subjects still
maintained protection against HPV types 16 and
18. Regardless of HPV status, the vaccine also
appears to prevent most occurrences of cervical
intraepithelial neoplasia lesions – abnormal,
precancerous cell growths found in the cervix.
They also found that the
vaccination offered significant protection
against genetically similar viruses. They
determined the vaccine to be 88 percent
effective against HPV type 45 and 54 percent
effective against HPV type 31.
“Overall, it is not a
surprise that the vaccine offers protection
against additional types of human papillomavirus,
as they are all related genetically,” said
Stanley Gall, M.D., professor at the University
of Louisville. “However, as you get genetically
farther from types 16 and 18, you would expect
to see less cross-protection.”
According to Dr. Gall,
effective preventative treatment with the
vaccine will depend on the long-term and broad
protection the vaccine can offer against
cancer-causing HPV types.
High Sustained Efficacy of
a Prophylactic Quadrivalent Human Papillomavirus
(HPV) (Types 6, 11, 16, 18) L1 Virus-Like
Particle (VLP) Vaccine against Cervical
Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN) grades 2/3 and
Adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS): Abstract LB-187
Note: This is a placeholder
abstract. Researchers will present follow-up
efficacy data on an FDA-approved HPV vaccine.
The full embargoed abstract will be available to
reporters on Saturday, April 14.
Results from a Phase I
study of a pancreatic cancer vaccine may offer
clues toward promoting long-term survival from
the disease, according to researchers from the
University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.
The researchers gave a
dendritic cell vaccine to 12 pancreatic cancer
patients. Four of the subjects have shown no
signs of recurrence in the three years since the
study began.
“The trial was a look at
the toxicity and feasibility of using a
dendritic cell-based vaccine against pancreatic
cancer,” said Andrew Lepisto, Ph.D,
post-doctoral researcher in the University of
Pittsburgh’s Department of Immunology. “While we
are unlikely to run large-scale trials with this
particular form of the vaccine due to difficulty
in its manufacturing, we have learned a
tremendous amount from the subjects that
benefited from the trial, which may translate
well into more practical vaccine formulations.”
The dendritic cell
vaccination strategy combines a cancer protein
with the patient’s own dendritic immune cells.
These cells are antigen presenting cells that,
in effect, advertise the presence of the antigen
molecule to the rest of the immune system. The
antigen, MUC-1, is a protein that is
over-produced by pancreatic cancer cells. By
presenting patients with MUC-1 on dendritic
cells, the researchers expected that they could
influence the white blood cells to attack
pancreatic cancer cells.
The study data suggests
that the key to the effectiveness of the vaccine
could be in controlling the regulatory T cells,
which suppress the immune system, says Lepisto.
Prior to vaccination, the pancreatic cancer
patients had significantly more regulatory T
cells than normal, which then increased
following each injection. Likewise, the patients
also experienced an increase in effector T
cells, white blood cells that respond against
antigen.
“Our next step is to create
a strategy that allows us to downplay the
regulatory T cells while still benefiting from
the increase of effector T cells,” Lepisto said.
Each year, pancreatic
cancer kills approximately 32,000 people in the
United States alone. Pancreatic cancer is
notoriously resistant to conventional cancer
therapies and has one of the lowest five year
survival rates of all cancers.
Researchers from the
University of Pittsburgh and the Gunma
University School of Medicine have developed a
vaccine that enlists multiple parts of the
immune system into targeting p53 in head and
neck squamous cell cancer. A phase I clinical
trial of the vaccine is currently underway at
the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute.
According to researchers,
this is the first vaccine that takes a
multi-pronged approach to stimulating the immune
system with derivatives of wild type – or
non-altered – p53, a tumor suppressor gene. Loss
of suppressor function or alteration of the p53
gene factors into nearly 80 percent of human
tumors. Tumor cells with altered p53 generally
tend to accumulate the protein, which led the
researchers to create a strategy that would
allow the immune system to destroy tumor cells
by targeting p53.
“Instead of creating a
vaccine based on mutant p53, which would require
a custom vaccine for every patient, our strategy
is to target parts of the unaltered p53 protein
that can best activate the immune system,” said
Theresa Whiteside, Ph.D., professor at the
University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine. “We
are using different unaltered portions of the
p53 molecule to entice the immune system into
attacking tumors.”
According to the
investigators, their vaccine uses three
different p53-derived peptides to elicit
responses from different aspects of immune
system. The vaccine currently in trial uses
autologous (patients’ own) dendritic cells (DC)
pulsed with a combination of three peptides: two
that trigger cytotoxic T cells, which directly
kill targeted tumor cells, and one peptide that
stimulates helper T cells.
Altogether, it is an
approach that not only excites the killer T
cells into action, but also influences the
helper T cells, which are instrumental in
sustaining the killer T-cell response. The
combined strategy has already shown great
promise in studies using animal models and human
cells in culture, according to the researchers.
The phase I trial, which
will eventually enroll 24 patients with head and
neck cancer, has three experimental arms, each
including a DC-based vaccine containing
p53-derived T cell-specific peptides. The three
groups vary on whether the cytotoxic p53
peptides are delivered alone or in combination
with a helper T cell-activating peptide that is
either specific to p53 or not specific to p53.
“Despite great medical
progress, the survival rate in head and neck
cancer still remains very poor, at about 50
percent, and there is a definite need for new
treatment modalities like vaccination,”
Whiteside said. “Targeting of p53, however, is a
strategy that could also work in treating a
number of different cancer types, since p53 loss
of function is such a common feature of many
cancers.”
The mission of the American
Association for Cancer Research is to prevent
and cure cancer. Founded in 1907, AACR is the
world’s oldest and largest professional
organization dedicated to advancing cancer
research. The membership includes more than
25,000 basic, translational, and clinical
researchers; health care professionals; and
cancer survivors and advocates in the United
States and more than 70 other countries. AACR
marshals the full spectrum of expertise from the
cancer community to accelerate progress in the
prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancer
through high-quality scientific and educational
programs. It funds innovative, meritorious
research grants.
The AACR Annual Meeting
attracts over 17,000 participants who share the
latest discoveries and developments in the
field. Special Conferences throughout the year
present novel data across a wide variety of
topics in cancer research, diagnosis and
treatment. AACR publishes five major
peer-reviewed journals: Cancer Research;
Clinical Cancer Research; Molecular Cancer
Therapeutics; Molecular Cancer Research; and
Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.
Its most recent
publication, CR, is a magazine for cancer
survivors, patient advocates, their families,
physicians, and scientists. It provides a forum
for sharing essential, evidence-based
information and perspectives on progress in
cancer research, survivorship and advocacy.