New
Service for TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
readers...roll mouse over, click on
highlighted links in stories to review items
from Amazon
Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Recurrent low-grade Carcinoma of the Ovary
less responsive to chemotherapy than more
common Ovarian Cancers
Newswise — Recurrent low-grade serous
carcinoma, a rare type of ovarian cancer, is
less sensitive to chemotherapy and therefore
more difficult to treat than more common
high-grade ovarian cancers, according to
researchers from The University of Texas M.
D. Anderson Cancer Center.
The findings were
reported at the Society of Gynecologic
Oncologists 39th Annual Meeting on Women's
Cancers.
The retrospective study is the first to
analyze how women with low-grade tumors
respond to chemotherapy in recurrent setting
and confirms clinical impressions that the
tumors are chemoresistant, said lead author
David M. Gershenson, M.D., professor and
chair of the Department of Gynecologic
Oncology at M. D. Anderson.
Previous studies
have shown similar tumor resistance in newly
diagnosed patients, and there is currently
no standard of care for women facing the
disease.
The results support a growing body of
research that shows low-grade ovarian tumors
behave differently than their high-grade
counterparts, genetically and clinically.
"In order to make meaningful advances in
treatment, women with low-grade ovarian
tumors must not be grouped together with
those with more common ovarian tumors.
"They
require unique consideration and more
targeted treatment options for a better
chance of survival," Gershenson said.
Gershenson and his colleagues identified all
patients treated for recurrent low-grade
serous carcinoma of the ovary seen at M. D.
Anderson from 1990 through 2007 using
databases from the Department of Gynecologic
Oncology.
Out of 52 patients with sufficient
clinical information with which to assess
response to one or more of 98 different
chemotherapy regimens, the overall response
rate was only 4 percent. Specifically,
researchers found:
* Among 24 patients who received carboplatin
for platinum-sensitive disease, there were
two partial responses and one complete
response.
* Of 11 patients who received a taxane/platinum
combination for platinum-sensitive disease,
no objective responses were observed.
* In the entire platinum-sensitive cohort,
the overall response rate was only 6
percent.
* No response was observed in women with
platinum-resistant disease to standard
chemotherapy agents such as liposomal
doxorubicin; topotecan; hexamethylmelamine;
oral VP-16; xeloda and gemcitabine. One
patient had a partial response to paclitaxel.
The overall response rate in this subgroup
was 2 percent.
* Sixty-one (62 percent) of the regimens
stabilized the disease from 8 to 79 weeks,
with a median of 22 weeks.
* In 18 instances of stable disease, CA125
levels decreased by 50 percent or more.
Gershenson said that these results compared
unfavorably to findings from trials of more
common ovarian cancers.
"It is unclear
whether the high rate of stable disease is
more reflective of tumor biology of
low-grade serous carcinoma of the ovary or
of the therapy regimen administered.
"However, since these tumors do not respond
to conventional types of chemotherapies, new
agents to treat these tumors must be
identified and tested," said Gershenson.
One area to explore further is hormonal
therapy, a treatment that has been shown to
have some activity against low-grade serous
carcinoma, he said. A detailed analysis of
the M.D. Anderson experience with hormonal
therapy is planned in the near future.
Low-grade serous carcinoma represents about
ten percent of all serous ovarian cancers.
The disease is characterized by a young age
at diagnosis - an average of 42 years old,
versus more common ovarian cancers, which
are generally diagnosed at about 60 years
old.
In addition, the median overall
survival of women with low-grade serous
carcinomas is much longer than that of
patient with high-grade ovarian cancers-82+
months versus 50-67 months in various
reported series.
Two-Tier Grading System Advances Better
Treatment Options
Histologic grade has been shown to be one of
the most important prognostic factors in
ovarian serous carcinoma cases. However, no
universal grading system exists.
Over the
last 15 years, researchers at M. D. Anderson
have developed a two-tier grading system for
serous carcinoma of the ovary (low and
high), based on knowledge that this type of
epithelial ovarian cancer comprises not one
homogenous group of tumors but rather two
distinct phenotypes.
Historically, a three-tier grading system to
classify tumors has been used, but there has
been no precise mechanism to define the
thresholds between the grades, particularly
grades two and three.
Consequently, there
were variations in designating how ovarian
tumors should be classified and ultimately,
treated.
Rare Ovarian Tumors Receive Increasing
Attention
The study of rare cancers, such as low-grade
serous carcinoma of the ovary, brings
inherent challenges, including the limited
number of cases to examine, difficulty in
obtaining tissue samples, low funding, and
the small pool of investigators working on
research, according to Gershenson.
Recognizing the need for more research, the
Gynecologic Oncology Group, a National
Cancer Institute-funded cooperative group,
recently established a rare tumor committee
that has initiated a separate series of
clinical trials for recurrent low-grade
serous carcinoma as well as for other rare
ovarian cancers.
Gershenson said that changing the design of
clinical trials to segregate patients is
key. "In addition to providing direct
benefits to patients and their families, the
study of rare tumors can also uncover
information about the etiology, biology, and
treatment of more common cancers."
In addition to Gershenson, authors on the
study include: Charlotte Sun, Dr.P.H., Diane
Bodurka, M.D., Robert Coleman, M.D., Karen
Lu, M.D., Anil Sood, M.D., and John Kavanagh,
M.D., all of M. D. Anderson's Department of
Gynecologic Oncology.
About M. D. Anderson
The University of Texas M. D. Anderson
Cancer Center in Houston ranks as one of the
world's most respected centers focused on
cancer patient care, research, education and
prevention. M. D. Anderson is one of only 39
Comprehensive Cancer Centers designated by
the National Cancer Institute. For five of
the past eight years, M. D. Anderson has
ranked No. 1 in cancer care in "America's
Best Hospitals," a survey published annually
in U.S. News and World Report.
...
...
...