New
Service for TodaysSeniorsNetwork.com
readers...roll mouse over, click on
highlighted links in stories to review items
from Amazon
Now, keep up to date
with daily feeds of newly posted stories
about America's Seniors...click on the box
to the left
Abused
women less likely to be in stable
relationships
Newswise — Poor women who are physically or
sexually abused at some point in their lives
are less likely to maintain stable intimate
relationships, according to a new study of
more than 2,500 women by sociologists from
The Johns Hopkins University and Penn State
University.
The women involved in the study said they
want fair treatment and companionship from
their partners, just like everybody does,
the researchers said.
Many of those who had been abused as adults
told ethnographers that they had decided to
forego marriage and cohabiting
relationships, at least temporarily. Those
who were sexually abused in childhood were
not as likely to avoid relationships
altogether; rather, they tended to engage in
a series of short-term, transient
relationships, many of them abusive.
While there is no evidence that abuse rates
have increased, the number of women
postponing intimate relationships may be
growing, said Andrew Cherlin, the Griswold
Professor of Public Policy at Johns Hopkins
and lead author of the report, "The
Influence of Physical and Sexual Abuse on
Marriage and Cohabitation," to be published
in the Jan. 21 issue of American
Sociological Review.
"What's changed over the past few decades is
the social context of abuse," Cherlin said.
"Women don't have to stay with abusive men
anymore because they have alternatives to
marriage."
The researchers, working in Boston, Chicago
and San Antonio as part of the long-term
research project called "Welfare, Children
and Families: A Three-City Study," surveyed
a random sample of 2,402 Hispanic, African
American, and white women.
Ethnographic research teams studied another
256 women in depth for several years,
observing day-to-day activities and
conducting repeated interviews.
All of the women studied were the primary
caregivers of at least one child.
Fifty-two percent of women in the
random-sample survey reported being
physically or sexually abused at some point
during their lives. Twenty-four percent said
they were sexually abused during childhood
or adolescence.
Forty-two percent of women who had never
been abused were married at the time of the
survey, compared to 22 percent of women who
had ever been abused. Of the 256 women
studied in depth, one-sixth -- many of whom
had been physically abused as adults -- said
they were taking a timeout from intimate
relationships with men.
"Women's decision to take a timeout from
such relationships is an important one for
policymakers to understand," said co-author
Linda Burton, director of the ethnographic
component and Penn State professor of human
development and sociology.
"These women are not saying they will never
enter intimate relationships again, but,
rather, they need recovery and reflection
time from abuse they experienced as adults
to avoid entering a subsequent abusive
relationship."
Cherlin and Burton suggest that reducing
levels of sexual abuse and physical violence
in families could increase the number of
healthy, stable, long-term unions.
They argue that current marriage promotion
policy debates at the federal and state
levels, which tend to blame declining
cultural values or unemployment for lower
marriage rates among the poor, should also
focus on the consequences of abuse.
Other authors are: Tera Hurt, University of
Georgia; and Diane Purvin, Wellesley
College.
Funding support came from National Institute
of Child Health and Human Development,
Office of the Assistant Secretary for
Planning and Evaluation, Administration on
Developmental Disabilities, Administration
for Children and Families, Social Security
Administration, National Institute of Mental
Health, The Boston Foundation, The Annie E.
Casey Foundation, The Edna McConnell Clark
Foundation, The Lloyd A. Fry Foundation,
Hogg Foundation for Mental Health, The
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, The Joyce
Foundation, The Henry J. Kaiser Family
Foundation, W. K. Kellogg Foundation,
Kronkosky Charitable Foundation, The John D.
and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation,
Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, The David
and Lucile Packard Foundation, and Woods
Fund of Chicago.
...
...
...